ن : abricande ت : چهار شنبه 27 بهمن 1400 ز : 6:9 | +

Tagged as one of the most intelligent directors of our country, Anurag saw a lull after his form of storytelling didn’t create a spark with the audience. Spending nearly two years on this film, Vineet surely shines bright and is on his way to attain star status with this one. What he chooses is what the film all about?Vineet Kumar Singh delivers an honest performance and is devoted to his role. He is a self-proclaimed goon of the city who uses his muse Shravan for his personal favours and in return, sanctions his dream to become a boxer.Debutante Zoya Hussain is clearly a winner in the role of a mute individual.

He lives a miserable life with his nagging old father Vijay Singh (Rajesh Tailang), a submissive mother, who is controlled by her husband’s bureaucracy, and a loving younger sister who ensures his brother focuses on his dream. Though Mukkabaaz is not as dark as his genre, the overall treatment is edgy and thrilling alongside the universal appeal.Shravan Kumar Singh (Vineet Singh), an uneducated lower caste guy from Bareilly aspires to become a top-class boxer. She seems to be more natural than deliberate. Shravan falls in love with Bhagwandas’s niece Sunaina (Zoya Hussain) who is unable to speak by birth.In a country where sportsmen struggle for respect, Mukkabaaz is also about the neglecting phase of boxing in small towns. The highlight of the film is its soundtrack that pushes the story ahead nylon polyester spandex fabric with its satirical words, including the track Paintra by Nucleya with boxer boys on the banks of Ganges in Banaras.Bhagwandas Mishra (Jimmy Sheirgill), a brash ex-boxer heads the boxing committee for youth.

0 (2016), writer-director Anurag Kashyap has been clearly made industry’s question mark. The director is back with yet another engaging story which is the journey of a rising boxer who meets challenges to achieve name and fame. Love story being the core premise of Mukkabaaz, Anurag packs a punch with its subtext of boxing. Written by Anurag and Vineet himself, Mukkabaaz packs a solid punch with its gripping narrative and spellbinding dialogues. Jimmy Sheirgill embraces the film with utmost dedication throughout. Ravi Kishan delivers a wonderful supporting role in his brief part. The film is definitely a milder version of the director, but there is not a dull moment in the movie either.Rating: Director: Anurag KashyapCast: Vineet Kumar Singh, Zoya Hussain, Jimmy Sheirgill, Ravi Kishan, Sadhna Singh and othersWith his last two duds Bombay Velvet (2015) and Raman Raghav 2.

He makes you feel disgusted about him as an evil goon. His ripped body and one-liners are an absolute treat. Shravan’s life changes upside down when Bhagwandas asks him to choose between his passion and love. Book you tickets now!.Hardcore Anurag Kashyap fans may be a bit disappointed with its happy ending and moreover, less of blood bath unlike his films. Nadiya Ke Paar fame actress Sadhna Singh is good in the role of a meek and helpless mother. Most likely based on a true story, Mukkabaaz is a well-knitted tale of love, passion and revenge

:: برچسب‌ها: Wholesale Recycled Fabric,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : پنج شنبه 21 بهمن 1400 ز : 6:16 | +

Over the past 50 years the people-to-people contact between the United States and China has been intense and extensive. China has risen on the foundations of its human capabilities. They fought for the liberation of all colonised people and against imperialism and colonialism in all its manifestations.Yet, even as China celebrates these landmark events, large parts of the world have become increasingly concerned about its assertion of newly acquired hard power -- economic and military. Whatever strategic and foreign policy compromises India might make in the short run cannot be a deviation from its “tryst with destiny”.This is a historic month for China. The Chinese too should realise that Indians are a proud people with their own memory of their civilisational inheritance and can be nobody’s cat’s paw. This is not a satisfactory state of affairs.Mr Gokhale is spot on. The Communist Party of China (CPC) came into being 100 years ago, in July 1921.The Xi Jinping regime is itself to blame for the acute focus in Indian public discourse on China’s negative attributes.The history of Indian nationalism is in many ways greater than the history of Chinese nationalism. For most Indians China is an adversary, a source of cheap products or the home of chow mien. The China-India relationship has moved from the honeymoon days of “Hindi-Chini bhai-bhai”, and the post-Cold War phase of increased economic and business interaction – “India-China buy-buy”, as someone put it -- to the current “Cold War” phase of “India-China bye-bye”. People-to-people relationships must stand on their own footing and not always be subject to state-to-state relations. However, it is in India’s interest to balance that with a better understanding of life in China.

More important, people-to-people interaction between the two republics over the past three quarters of a century has been even more limited. When asked by a Briton in that period “How far would you cut India off from the Empire?”, Gandhiji replied: “From the Empire, completely; from the British nation, not at all, if I want India to gain and not to grieve. China’s spectacular rise over the past quarter century, as a global trading superpower, the “factory of the world”, and as Asia’s most powerful nation, ready to challenge America’s global dominance, is the stuff of legend.It is in the interests of both China and India that there is similar engagement between their people, even as the two states jostle with each other for strategic space within Asia and the world.Whatever the differences between the two countries, and there are many, there ought to be both a better understanding of each other within both societies and increased people-to-people interaction.This worryingly low level of social and cultural interaction between China and India has dipped further thanks to renewed tensions between the two and the post-Galwan and post-Covid freeze in bilateral interactions. Indians ought to have a better appreciation of that.

At one level this is not surprising.India’s attitude towards China today should not be very different from the view that Mahatma Gandhi famously expressed of the kind of relationship that he sought with Britain and its people in the midst of the national movement for Independence. Mahatma Gandhi and the Indian  National Congress did not fight for India’s liberation alone. China is not merely an authoritarian, militarised Communist regime, which it is, but it is also a highly creative and productive knowledge-based society and economy.In his recently published pithy narration of the events at Beijing’s Tiananmen Square in the summer of 1989 (Tiananmen Square: The Making of a Protest, A Diplomat Looks Back), former foreign secretary and a former Indian ambassador to China Vijay Gokhale observes in passing: “Indians can no longer afford to have a superficial understanding of events involving their largest neighbour and to-be-hegemon, other than at their own peril”. But it must be a partnership on equal terms. In looking back at China’s rise a large part of the public discourse in India has been dominated by commentators on foreign policy, security and defence. The fact is that the interaction between the neighbours has been limited through most history.. Communist China entered the international mainstream a half century ago, in July 1971, when the United States decided to come to terms with the reality of its existence. Regrettably, very little has appeared in print on the social, cultural and human dimensions of China’s transformation and rise.

In July 1971, when then US national security adviser Henry Kissinger met Chairman Mao Zedong in Beijing and proposed a US-China condominium against the Soviet Union, China did not give up its civilisational inheritance of being an independent-minded nation. India too seeks that space for its own development. The British Empire must go and I should love to be an equal partner with Britain, sharing her joys and sorrows.”Even as India rejects China’s hegemonic ambitions, as it did the hegemony of the West, and disapproves of its authoritarian political system, Indians must acquire a better understanding and appreciation of Chinese society, culture and its knowledge-creating institutions. It walked a path that gave it the strategic space for its own rise. Only a couple of bright Indian journalists and a handful of scholars have been able to bridge the public awareness gap between the two. Little wonder then that even today we depend so much on retired diplomats to educate us about contemporary China. For over a century Indians fought Western imperialism and colonialism and yet not only acquired an intimate knowledge of Western culture, science, literature, music and so on, but also benefitted from such knowledge. It has created the china recycled fabrics foundation for a durable relationship even when the two seek today greater strategic space for themselves. Yet so much about what appears in print in India about China is about foreign affairs and the economy, written mostly by Westerners or Indians living in the West, and so little from Indians with a first-hand knowledge and experience of life and people in China

:: برچسب‌ها: China Nylon Spandex Fabric,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : چهار شنبه 29 دی 1400 ز : 5:33 | +

And finally comes Chinese ambassador to India Luo Zhaohui’s remark, that he made while sitting with a galaxy of Indian opinion-makers in a five-star hotel in New Delhi’s Lutyens’ Zone earlier this month, audaciously suggesting that there should be “trilateral” talks between India, Pakistan and China on various “regional issues”. Obviously, very important and influential Indians are under China’s patronage. While Chinese diplomat Hua Chunying said Jammu and Kashmir is a India-Pakistan “bilateral issue”, she very cleverly kept mum on China’s forced presence in J&K since 1963, in brazen violation of Indian sovereignty.The statements issued by different Chinese diplomats betray Beijing’s real intentions and motives which are completely unbecoming of a benign, good neighbour.China’s military invasion on Indian soil in October 1962 too was akin to today’s diplomatic offensive — to cage and confine India within a small area, choking its operational flexibility, as well as checking its diplomatic freedom and demographic space; tying adversaries in knots and giving China leverage to dominate and dictate through gunboat diplomacy.While India successfully remained out of all power blocs in the past 60 years, it now appears it will get embroiled with two of its unfriendly and scheming neighbours, China and Pakistan.

Having said that, I must also note that India is equally to blame for China’s arrogant attitude, as Indian diplomacy has been quite weak on this front, thanks to its fractured polity. From the bedroom to the bathroom; the drawing room to the study; the verandah to the garage, China has entered the ordinary gullible Indian’s benign psyche through cheap, substandard consumer goods after having committed theft of Western technology. All this doesn’t leave any doubt whatsoever over China’s aggressive intent.Mr Wang’s statement appears funny. China plans to penetrate further on Indian soil by planting seeds of mistrust and distrust in the minds of Indians. But I think after their joining of the SCO, maybe we can say their relationship might be better as the grouping provides a better platform and opportunities for building the relations between them. It is constantly interfering, invading, instigating, intimidating, financing and arming Pakistani terrorists to kill Indian troops in hundreds. Today, J&K is like China’s playground, and its aim is to confine India in the same basement room where Pakistan is. Hence, his point can be seen as an extension of what Mr Wang had said regarding “SCO for Indo-Pak bilateral under Chinese supervision”! Is it a bona fide wish or mala fide kite-flying to put rivals on the wrong foot? China being the mover and shaker of the eight-nation SCO as well as its host, why must it indulge in “something unethical, and extra-unwarranted?”Significantly, what Mr Luo said on June 18 is a ruthless repetition of the past fortnight warning by his boss, Mr Wang: “We know there are existing and historical unresolved issues and conflicts between Pakistan and India.

Meanwhile, by putting the onus on his “Indian friends”, Mr Luo seems to be testing the waters on one hand and creating doubts in the minds of many Indians on the other. It has trapped India as the entire Chinese brass, from foreign ministry spokesperson Hua and ambassador Luo to foreign minister Wang, are singing one tune. Then, Chinese foreign minister Wang Yi categorically declared: “SCO could be a great vehicle to improve India-Pak ties”. The SCO constitutes a backdoor entry of India into BRI/CPEC/OBOR under duress (Delhi had earlier opposed it tooth and nail, claiming it was a violation of its sovereignty). This is Chinese military strategist and philosopher Sun Tzu’s art of war: to win a war, fight without firing; try weakening the opponent psychologically, through cunning, deceit, duplicity, lies and money. What does he really think: Is SCO a multilateral forum or a platform for India-Pakistan bilateral issues?And Mr Luo wants his Indian audience to believe that his suggestion originates from “some Indian friends”, thereby trying to push New Delhi into a corner..”What Mr Wang said is well known; but if one reads between the lines there is a clear warning for India — “Watch out, we are coming.

China stands exposed in the J&K turmoil..There isn’t an iota of doubt that China has arrived deep inside Indian households today.China’s SCO diplomacy has put India into an irreversible backfoot.The CPEC, OBOR and BRI is a facade to grab land — from Karakoram to Karachi; Doklam to Dhaka; Lhasa to Haldia. We will interfere in your internal affairs along with Pakistan, and you can do nothing about it except watch helplessly or fall in line to allow the Sino-Pak axis take charge of your problems, from border to J&K, CPEC, BRI, OBOR .Remember, a situation could now develop where a Sino-Indian border bilateral issue could become a trilateral or even multilateral one! It could be border talks between China-India-Pakistan or China-India-Nepal or China-India-Bhutan.Mr Luo served as Beijing’s man in Pakistan too, from 2006 to 2010.After having joined the SCO, India can only curse its fate — as SCO is China’s fiefdom. All this is thanks to successive Indian establishments which failed to take stock of the situation, visualise the unfolding grim reality and the irreparable potential damage which China can inflict on India’s sovereignty, security, safety and integrity, and its very existence in its present geographical form — with J&K in north, West Bengal in the east and the seven northeastern Poly Spandex fabric for sale states being the most vulnerable.

Consequently, India stands almost trapped by China deep inside its own territory. He must have done “long-term” homework to put in place the geo-politico-eco-military-strategic goal of China. They have launched a concerted and calculated diplomatic assault (in Beijing and Delhi) against India, and compelling India to virtually kowtow before China.China will soon take J&K to the UN, taking full advantage of its permanent membership of the Security Council and internationalise it in such a big way that India will only see the sordid saga as a “helpless victim”. Other South Asian matters could also be between China-India-Bangladesh or China-India-Sri Lanka or China-India-Maldives; and in each and every stage the verdict is likely to be 2-1 against India. We may or may not believe him, but Mr Luo is a skilful diplomat who knows how to exploit political differences within our democracy as he has “some Indian friends”.. Understandably, he was witness to the assassination of Benazir Bhutto in December 2007; he was there when the Mumbai terror attack started on November 26, 2008 under the patronage of the mullah-military-militant masterminds. to your relations with all neighbouring countries of South Asia,” he seems to have conveyed

:: برچسب‌ها: Wholesale Polyester Knitted Fabric,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : شنبه 25 دی 1400 ز : 5:2 | +

After the 22nd round of India-China border talks held in September 2019, China and India agreed for the first time to coordinate patrolling at one disputed point along the Line of Actual Control in Arunachal Pradesh as a confidence-building measure to maintain peace at the border, the reported said. China also employs non-military tools coercively, including economic tools during periods of political tensions with countries that Beijing accuses of harming its national interests, the report said.Washington: China has been using coercive tactics in pursuit of territorial and maritime claims in the South and East China Seas, as well as along its border with India and Bhutan, the Pentagon said on Tuesday. Vietnam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Brunei and Taiwan have counterclaims over the area.In recent years, the People&jacquard fabric suppliers39;s Liberation Army (PLA) has also increased patrols around and near Taiwan using bomber, fighter, and surveillance aircraft to signal Taiwan.

In October 2019, President Xi Jinping met with Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Chennai to discuss economic relations and the importance of the peaceful resolution of contentious issues, particularly regarding the border.In August 2019, China submitted "early harvest" proposals regarding China-India border issues to India, which was the first time that China had approached India with resolution proposals, the report said. This meeting was the second summit between Xi and Modi, the first of which occurred in April 2018 following the 2017 Doklam standoff, it said. China calibrates its coercive activities to fall below the threshold of provoking armed conflict with the United States, its allies and partners, or others in the Indo-Pacific region," the Pentagon said in its annual report on China to the Congress.However, Chinese and Indian forces have regularly interacted since the 2017 Doklam standoff and generally kept disputes from escalating in 2019, it said."China's leaders use tactics short of armed conflict to pursue China's objectives.Chinese and Indian patrols regularly encounter one another along the disputed border, and both sides often accuse one another of border incursions, it said."These tactics are particularly evident in China's pursuit of its territorial and maritime claims in the South and East China Seas as well as along its border with India and Bhutan," said the report titled 'Military and Security Developments involving the People's Republic of China 2020' that was released by the Pentagon..China has been fast expanding military and economic influence in the Indo-Pacific region, triggering concern in various countries of the region and beyond.

China is engaged in hotly contested territorial disputes in both the South China Sea and the East China Sea.China claims almost all of the South China Sea.The report, however, makes no mention of the latest border row between India and China in Ladakh.India and China have held several rounds of military and diplomatic talks in # the last two-and-half months but no significant headway has been made for a resolution to the border row in eastern Ladakh.Giving its assessment of India-China border in 2019, the Pentagon said that officials from China and India continued regular meetings regarding their disputed border, while low-level face-offs persisted between Chinese and Indian military personnel. Both areas are stated to be rich in minerals, oil and other natural resources and are vital to global trade.Chinese and Indian forces both continued construction and patrols in contested regions along the disputed border, but generally kept tensions from escalating in 2019, it said. Beijing has built up and militarised many of the islands and reefs it controls in the region.

Although India was not pleased with the proposals, the 22nd meeting of the Special Representatives of India and China occurred in December 2019 and reinforced both sides' shared intent to manage tensions in the border region, it said.Even as China settled 11 land-based territorial disputes with six of its neighbours, since 1998, in the recent years, Beijing has employed a more coercive approach to deal with several disputes over maritime features and ownership of potentially rich offshore oil and gas deposits, it said."Tensions with India persist along the northeastern border near the Indian state of Arunachal Pradesh, which China asserts is part of Tibet and therefore part of China, and near the Aksai Chin region at the western end of the Tibetan Plateau," the Pentagon said in its report to the Congress

:: برچسب‌ها: recycled polyester fabric wholesale,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : پنج شنبه 23 دی 1400 ز : 5:30 | +

Defense Secretary Ash Carter has warned that developing Scarborough would be seen as "destabilizing" because of its proximity to the Philippines' main islands, where the U."We will be pointing out that China is not following the rule of law," he said.While it has barred the Philippines from disputed Scarborough Shoal ever since winning a 2013 maritime standoff, it has shown no recent signs of carrying out the sort of massive reclamation work there that it has on other coral reefs, including building ports and airstrips atop them.S.Based on his remarks so far, Duterte, who takes office on June 30, is unlikely to follow Aquino's hard line stance against China, said Jay Batongbacal, who heads the Institute for Maritime Affairs and Law of the Sea at the state-run University of the Philippines.Seeking to win over global opinion, both China and chief Philippine ally the United States have been lining up friendly nations to back their positions."The only way developing states have a stake in the system," Kraska said, "Is if it is governed by the rule of law in which the law binds the strong states as well as the weak.N.Regardless of China's arguments denying the panel's legality, it "will damage China's reputation and image," said Yun Sun, an expert on Chinese foreign policy at the U.""

Given the stakes in oil, natural resources and strategic depth, I suspect the Chinese government is willing to pay that price," agreed Michael Desch, co-director of the International Security Program at the University of Notre Dame in the U. "As time goes by, I believe the plot will eventually come to light. campaign to contain its rise to prominence, Beijing's officials see an American plot behind the case.By its actions, China is demonstrating that countries can reject such measures whenever they conflict with their interests.The collateral cost, analysts say: harm to global efforts to resolve similar territorial disputes through legal means.The case before The Hague tribunal, filed by the Philippines, centers on the applicability of China's vaguely drawn "nine-dash line" South China Sea boundary under the United Nations Convention of the Law of the Sea, or UNCLOS.That the panel is headed by a former diplomat from China's old nemesis, Japan, makes it even more worthy of derision, Chinese critics say.""The South China Sea arbitration unilaterally initiated by the Philippines is nothing but a political scheme for one party to insult the other and will be recorded as an infamous case in the history of international law," Vice Foreign Minister Liu Zhenmin told a group of visiting reporters in Beijing earlier this month.For months, Chinese officials, state media outlets and high-ranking military officers have maintained a relentless stream of invective against the Philippines' pursuit of arbitration, calling it unlawful, illegitimate and a "political farce.China's noncompliance is also damaging to UNCLOS itself, since it could discourage compliance with other features of the convention, particularly its establishment of 200-nautical mile (370-kilometer) exclusive economic zones, said James Kraska, a professor of oceans law and policy at the U. Naval War College.Within the context of what China perceives as a relentless U. arbitration tribunal over its South China Sea claims.

A decision is expected sometime within the next several weeks, but since there is no enforcement mechanism, its potential impact is unclear. So they will probably sit down with us and say, 'OK, can we settle this in a diplomatic manner '"Whatever the outcome, China's refusal to cooperate with the tribunal could harm efforts to promote international arbitration that have already been hamstrung by the occasional refusal of the United States and others to 100 polyester fabric recognize the International Court of Justice and other institutions.S. Yet Beijing seems prepared to absorb the cost to its reputation, confident that in terms of territory and resources, it won't lose a thing. Beijing: Even before a ruling, China may have lost by refusing to cooperate with a U. Stimson Center think tank.S. "I don't think they want to be pictured as a rogue nation.China appears to be holding out the possibility of coaxing the Philippines into bilateral talks that have so far gone nowhere."Its reference to the use of "friendly consultations and negotiations by sovereign states directly concerned," underscores China's insistence that bilateral negotiations are the only way forward, something critics call a transparent attempt to divide the disputants and keep the dispute off the agenda of multilateral mechanisms.Despite pressure from Washington and elsewhere, China appears determined to avoid granting any hint of legitimacy to a process that might challenge its claim to ownership of virtually the entire South China Sea, including its islands, reefs, fish stocks and potentially rich reserves of oil and gas. has a small military presence."The ruling can't be objective and fair, and we won't be giving up our historical rights simply to make China look good," said Wu Shicun, president of the National Institute for South China Sea Studies.That may be an attempt to retain some credibility over its repeated evocations of the 2002 Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea signed between China and the 10 members of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations.S.

However, Sun said that's considered a relatively small price to pay to retain control over the "tangible real territory," far more important than any question of "face. has been so active in backing the arbitration behind the scene," said Liu, the vice foreign minister. Despite its island-building efforts and military buildup in the South China Sea, China has shown some signs of restraint in not expanding its claims or vigorously seeking to eject other countries' militaries from islands it claims."We don't understand why the U.Along with China and the Philippines, four other governments, Brunei, Malaysia, Taiwan and Vietnam also claim islands and reefs falling within the nine-dash line, while Indonesia has expressed concern about the Chinese boundary overlapping with its exclusive economic zone.Regardless of Duterte's approach, Philippine ambassador to Washington Jose Cuisia predicted a diplomatic standoff if China ignores a negative decision.S.S. By its actions, China is demonstrating that countries can reject such measures whenever they conflict with their interests."Liu said Beijing remains committed to bilateral negotiations, giving no direct indication of a tougher response.S."Whatever the result, this is a definite loss for China since we've been forced to assume a passive role," Wu said.That document states that parties concerned "undertake to resolve their territorial and jurisdictional disputes by peaceful means, without resorting to the threat or use of force.

Even government-backed scholars such as Wu say that the case is a no-win situation for China. Philippine President-elect Rodrigo Duterte has shown indications of being more flexible on the issue than current President Benigno Aquino III.U.". Yet, with the exception of Russia, which has been expelled from the G7 and is under heavy international sanctions, those whose support Beijing's claims are mostly small states from outside the region with little influence over the dispute

:: برچسب‌ها: jacquard fabric Factory,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : پنج شنبه 16 دی 1400 ز : 10:51 | +

It would seem India and China are destined to live out the foreseeable future as rivals, if not adversaries. In per capita terms we might still be poorer, but in GDP terms it will be bigger.The inexorable growth of China’s GDP has been the dominant event of the past three decades.It is in this context that China’s diplomacy holds some vital lessons for India. This is a made-to-order situation for strategists and leaders in the three countries to ply their trade with plenty of worst-case scenarios. In recent years there has been much speculation on the emerging rivalry between India and China. This is way into the future, and the future often has a habit of not playing out as predicted. This ability will ensure that the swords remain recessed and the plowshares be out at work.China’s defence budget has almost certainly seen double-digit growth for two decades.China’s aggressive soft power diplomacy has widely been seen as arguably the most important element in shaping the Indian Ocean strategic environment,  region’s dynamics.. A good deal of this is because India has joined China in the high GDP growth club. Both have too much to lose by it. Its military leaders constantly stress that the development of what is still only a middle-income country with a lot of poor people takes precedence over military ambitions. “China is a big country,” he said, “and other countries are small countries, and that is just a fact. There are three limiting factors. The lower classes will be constant, at around 300 million, as it is at present.He is also well aware that unlike America and Japan, which are physically distant adversaries, India lives cheek by jowl with China with a disputed border.3 billion is likely to belong to the middle and upper classes. Many economists claim that by 2050 it will be India that will have the world’s biggest economy, not China. Not surprisingly, the leaders of both nations are investing heavily in them. Japan is the biggest overseas investor in China.6 trillion. According to SIPRI, a research institute, annual defence spending rose from over $30 billion in 2000 to almost $215 billion in 2015.China’s rise as the world’s greatest exporter, its largest manufacturing nation and its great economic appetite poses a new set of challenges.

This growth projected to start in 2015 and will continue well past 2050.This is not a sum that India can match and the last thing we need to get caught in is a numbers game.India already has the world’s third-largest GDP. First, unlike the former Soviet Union, China has a vital national interest in the stability of the global economic system.6 billion, of which 1.India, on the other hand, will keep growing long after China has stopped growing. SIPRI usually adds about 50 per cent to the official figure China gives for defence spending, as even basic military items are kept off the budget. A one-party dictatorship will always be able to outspend us, even if our GDPs get closer. At a meeting of South-East Asian nations in 2010, China’s foreign minister Yang Jiechi, facing a barrage of complaints about his country’s behaviour, blurted out the sort of thing polite leaders usually prefer to leave unsaid. Yet these two nations are highest in China’s ranking of adversaries. That is just a fact too, one that the rest of the world has to come to terms with. Conflict cannot be a standoff affair for both nations.Geography and recent history have made the India-China relationship a difficult one, and one in which the US will find ample space and opportunity to inveigle itself to its advantage.If India keeps growing at the current rate of around seven per cent, its GDP will surpass that of China by 2045; and if India’s population stabilises in 2050 at 1.But what does this imply for the world’s power structure It is undeniable that the world’s economic fulcrum will shift to Asia. China’s GDP is expected to surpass that of the US well before 2020, when it will be about $24.”Indeed it is, and China is big not merely in terms of territory and population, but also military might. Its youthful population and present growth trends indicate the accumulation of the world’s largest middle class in India.6 trillion, compared to America’s $23.6 billion, then in all likelihood its GDP too will surpass China’s.In fact, so big will this become that India in this period will increasingly power the world’s economic growth, not China. Both modern states are inheritors of age-old traditions and the wisdom of the ages.There is a certain equilibrium in Sino-Indian affairs that make recourse to force extremely improbable.The real test of China’s willingness to keep military spending constant will come when China’s headlong economic growth starts to slow further. It is Indian and Chinese troops that face each other eyeball to eyeball. Its Communist Party presides over the world’s largest military buildup. To replicate China’s achievement might be a tall order for a nation like India, which matches it in size and potential, but not in political structure and national will.

The US is China’s biggest trading partner and contributes hugely to the China’s economy, with its gigantic annual trade deficits.The china fabric suppliers writer, a policy analyst studying economic and security issues, held senior positions in government and industry. Both now know how much of the sword must be unsheathed to send a message.That said, the threat from China should not be exaggerated. In 2050, India is projected to have a population of 1. Asia’s GDP already exceeds that of the US and the European Union. Having surpassed Japan a few years ago, China is now taking aim at the United States ($17 trillion). It is now about one-third of China’s. By 2050 it will account for over 50 per cent of global GDP, with India or China at the top. The list of nations that are now within China’s strategic orbit appears to be growing. So we must look at the present. Last year, its spending on internal security outstripped military spending for the first time. With a population that is rapidly ageing, it is also a good bet that meeting the demand for better healthcare will become a higher priority than maintaining military spending. Prime Minister Narendra Modi seems to have drawn some lessons from this, and is seeking a closer and deeper economic and financial engagement with China, though many in India’s security establishment look at it with askance. He also specialises in the Chinese economy.

Peace and growing economic interdependence are more viable options. It took China a little less than a decade to make a similar leap to overtake Japan. Going by past form, China’s leaders will continue to worry more about internal threats than external ones. By giving large loans on generous repayment terms, investing in major infrastructure projects such as the building of roads, dams, ports, power plants and railways, and offering military assistance and political support in the UN Security Council with its veto power, China has got considerable goodwill and influence among the Indian Ocean region countries

:: برچسب‌ها: Wholesale Recycled Fabric,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : دو شنبه 6 دی 1400 ز : 11:10 | +

China has also been blocking India&recycled fabrics factory39;s move to get Pakistan-based Jaish-e-Mohammed chief Masood Azhar sanctioned by the UN Security Council.China, however, backed both India and Pakistan to become full members of the Beijing-based SCO.3-million-strong PLA, the world's largest standing army, as "one of the finest military outfits in the world," he said the Pakistan army and the people of Pakistan take great pride in "our deep rooted brotherly relationship" with China."We are also actively cooperating in all fields against war on terror.

Both countries have assumed shared responsibility towards stability in the region and prosperity of their people, he said.Describing China and Pakistan as "important strategic players in the region," Gen. kashmir issue, nsg, china-pak ties Pakistan, Islamabad, Islamabad. Bajwa, who was the chief guest at a reception in Rawalpindi yesterday hosted by the Chinese Embassy, said, their bilateral ties have jointly benefited both the countries. Gen.While China is blocking India's membership bid in the NSG as New Delhi is not a signatory to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, Beijing is apparently seeking equal treatment to its ally Pakistan in the elite nuclear trading group.' Pakistan is "indebted" to its all-weather ally China for its "unflinching support" to it on the Kashmir issue, the expansion of the Nuclear Suppliers Group and the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation, Army chief General Qamar Javed Bajwa has said.Pak ‘indebted’ to China for support on Kashmir issue, NSG: army chief Bajwa Describing China and Pakistan as ‘important strategic players in the region,’ Gen. Bajwa also claimed that China had always provided "unconditional support" to Pakistan's efforts for reconciliation in Afghanistan. Bajwa said their ties have benefited both the countries.He noted that both China and Pakistan are faced with similar challenges and opportunities.Read: Pakistan says Kashmir still core dispute with IndiaGen.Read: After Pak, China now interfering in Kashmir affairs: J&K CM after meeting HM"This unity of purpose has led to the consolidation and has strengthened our resolve as determined nations, to brave all challenges and storms together," he was quoted as saying in a press release issued by the Inter Services Public Relations, the media wing of the Pakistan army.The Pakistan army chief also pointed out that China and his country has expanded their cooperation to wider areas have launched strategic initiatives like the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor, defence collaboration in numerous joint projects and united diplomatic front, internationally."

It is a relationship based on mutual trust, respect, understanding and cooperation."Calling the 2. In fact, this friendship is flourishing with every passing day, which encompasses ever aspect of our life," he said at a function to celebrate the 90th anniversary of the founding of China's People's Liberation Army (PLA). Moreover, from diplomatic cooperation to security collaboration, we have stood by each other through thick and thin and shall continue to stand shoulder to shoulder, come rain or shine," he added."Pakistan is indebted to China for its unflinching support to our perspective at all international forums, may it be expansion of Nuclear Suppliers Group, Kashmir Issue, or Pakistan's full membership of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation," Gen. Bajwa said the "professional collaboration between PLA and Pakistan army, will continue to expand to bring peace to the region in general and China - Pakistan in particular.Read: No third-party help, India rejects China's mediation offer on KashmirGen. Bajwa said. Bajwa said the 'professional collaboration between PLA and Pakistan army, will continue to expand to bring peace to the region in general and China - Pakistan in particular

:: برچسب‌ها: China Wholesale Nylon Spandex Fabric,

.:: ::.

ن : abricande ت : چهار شنبه 17 آذر 1400 ز : 11:22 | +

Walmart’s $16 billion stake in Flipkart meant a 64 per cent year-on-year jump.First, like Shelley’s Ozymandias, Modi hankers to impress future generations with massive creations.Another yardstick is that while India is inordinately proud of its nine Nobel laureates, their success is really happenstance.As the former Prime Minister, Dr Manmohan Singh, has always reiterated, the Asian ecosystem has ample space for India and China both to grow together. But the way to counter that is not empty bombast and blowing hot and cold, but to build up India’s own economic strength, bargain hard over trade terms to increase India’s exports, and to cooperate in economic and development projects that help both countries.Modi squanders money on architectural extravaganzas like the Ayodhya temple to Ram that is now being built, reinventing Delhi and gigantic statuary instead of investing in liveable housing, potable water and a creaky healthcare system that is incapable of coping with Covid-19.2 trillion.5 trillion, compared with China spandex manufacturer.Among Chinese Internet companies active in India, Alibaba recently invested $45 million in India’s e-commerce platform Paytm.Of course, the Chinese have a strategy and the purpose is to help China, not India.”Australia could be replaced by India in that sentence from a recent article in Hong Kong’s South China Morning Post newspaper by Yuan Jiang, a Chinese Ph. China’s eight prize-winners are the products of the solid primary and secondary school system that has been built up throughout the country. It was an unkind cut for two reasons.As a result, while India’s GDP grew 8.Like Australia, India too cannot contain China in the South China Sea.China, meanwhile, never ceases to advertise itself as the only one among the world’s top five healthcare markets with double digit growth. Moreover, India’s $79 billion remittances from abroad exceeded the $67 billion that the overseas Chinese sent back.

“As Australia draws closer to the US in the name of national security and # pursues trade diversification, it risks alienating China, its largest trading partner by far with a crucial role in its economic recovery. If the goal had been conquest, China would not have walked away after Bomdila in 1962. But we must know the threat in order to repulse it.D.Standing up to China sounds undeniably patriotic.

In neither case is there a lucid articulation of why precisely China is feared.At the same time, Modi glosses over China’s territorial incursions in Ladakh for reasons that may not be very creditable.”The patronising tone is easily explained: leaving aside the 1962 border war, although both countries have roughly the same population, India’s GDP is only $2. There are also signs that the Indian tortoise may not be crawling too far behind the Chinese hare.While foreign corporate launches, mergers and acquisitions in China amounted to nearly $41.6 billion last year, India did not do too badly, with $40. Restrictions on investment from neighbouring countries -- as if Pakistan would put money into India or Nepal has any to do so -- are too thinly veiled to fool anyone.However, one of the most important of the several factors that stand in the way of India’s robust growth is the obsession with spectacle instead of development.High mobile penetration among 1. It would only diminish itself by becoming another Tibet, Xinjiang or now Hong Kong in America’s anti-China armoury.As the Congress’ Ahmed Patel remarked, Modi has paid nine official visits to China whereas no other Indian Prime Minister has gone there more than twice.3 billion Indians owes much to Chinese Internet platforms, which know from their domestic experience how to translate demographic dividends into consumption power to attract more foreign investment.7 per cent.Sunanda K Datta-Ray | Make India stronger in order to take on China Sunanda K Datta RaySunanda K Datta-Ray is a senior journalist, columnist and author.

Only China’s Jiangxi Toqine Metal Crafts Corporation, allegedly the world's largest foundry, could produce the 7,000 or so bronze plates and panels that the $430-million, 600-ft figure needed.If it was economic domination, the Chinese would not have wanted to invest in infrastructure (highways, railways, ports and airports) as well as manufacturing to reduce India’s trade deficit and Mr Modi's “Make in India” dream.2 per cent in the second quarter, China’s economy grew 6.There are enough consumers and sources of raw material and investment capital for two burgeoning economies. student at Australia’s Queensland University of Technology.Congress leader Rahul Gandhi was even more cutting, and pointing to Modi’s obsession with the gigantic statue of Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel, he added: “It will be the world’s tallest statue but it will be ‘Made in China’, like our shoes and shirts. Workers hang dyed yarn for drying under the sun as seen on the National Handloom Day at a textile mill, in Guntur, Andhra Pradesh.Some of Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s recent actions might suggest he would like to ban all business with China but lacks the confidence to do so.Some of his critics suggest that China alone welcomed him when Britain and the United States refused him visas because they disapproved of his attitude to Muslims as the chief minister of Gujarat.

As China’s Global Times, a daily tabloid published under the Chinese Communist Party’s auspices, noted smugly: “India’s rapid progress in catching up with China when it comes to attracting foreign investment shows its potential to become a global economic powerhouse, but whether India will be the next China in terms of economic growth depends on many factors, and how much help and investment it gets from China may be one of the first and foremost.Exhorting Indian businessmen to take advantage of the Covid-19 pandemic to lure foreign investors away from China annoys Beijing while ignoring the reasons (weak infrastructure, poor work ethic, bureaucratic stranglehold and all-pervasive corruption) why investors shunned India in the first place.6 billion in foreign direct investment

.:: ::.